Friday, November 15, 2024

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and his Attack on Science, Part Two

 

 This is my second entry into a critique of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s book, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health. The first entry can be found here. Part three can be found here. A summary of the first three posts can be found here. The first entry discussing Chapter One is here. The second entry discussing Chapter One is here.


(Note: I accidentally overwrote a long version of this post with a draft. I have endeavored to restore the long, finished version.) 


Continuing with the Introduction


 I left off midway through the Introduction in the middle of an attack on Fauci and his response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Perhaps it was a good place to break. Let me begin this chapter in my blog by addressing larger issues. 


I began my life as a scientist from a Christian perspective. There are few more succinct summaries of science than what can be found in the First Letter to the Thessalonians, chapter 5, verse 21: Test all things. Hold fast to what is good.


Kennedy declares in his Introduction: "Science, like democracy, flourishes on skepticism toward official orthodoxies." No, this is closer to the definition of contrarianism. Skepticism toward official doctrines is only half the story. Science uses skepticism to build useful "truths" that become orthodoxies. Contrarianism does advocate testing all things, but it doesn't hold fast to what is good.


Quite often what is orthodoxy is perfectly correct (that's the goal of science). The body of knowledge of aerodynamics provides what is needed to create airplanes that fly. To claim that aerodynamics is an  orthodoxy that prevents people from flapping their arms and flying off rooftops is ludicrous. That it criticizes people who believe in arm flying and censors them from science journals is a good thing.


Sometimes those orthodoxies are based on errors. Fine. Question and continue to question. But not by invective.  You have to build and test your arguments to improve on those that came before. Hurling bombs to tear things down is cheap. Doing it dishonestly is not skepticism.


Invective, noun. A denunciatory or abusive discourse. (This book, denouncing with its very title.) Kennedy doesn't simply set out to construct a villain in Fauci. He seeks to create a supervillain. The following are the loaded terms he uses to describe the response to COVID and to Fauci himself in the Introduction. 


Invectives directed to the response to COVID. (2nd paragraph of Introduction) generate fear, promote obedience, discourage critical thinking, herd seven billion people to march to a single tune, health experiments with a "novel, shoddily tested, improperly licensed technology so risky that manufacturers refused to produce it unless every government on Earth shielded them from liability." (They got every government on earth to agree to something?) 


(3rd paragraph.) totalitarianism, mass propaganda, censorship, promotion of terror, suppression of debate, vilification of dissent, forcefully prevent protest. unwanted, experimental, zero-liability medical interventions. Objectors faced orchestrated gaslighting, marginalization, and scapegoating. Essentially repeating the second paragraph but changing the words. Forceful invective, poor writing.


(5th paragraph) "suddenly turned against our citizens and our values with such violence." I'll keep an open mind about this, but I don't recall violence. Perhaps he will provide examples, later.


(later) carefully planned militarization and monetization of medicine that left American health ailing and its democracy shattered. propelling our country toward the desolate destination where democracy goes to die.


Invective directed toward Fauci. technocrat who orchestrated a historic coup d'état against Western democracy. power enjoyed by few rulers and no doctor in history. Encouraged his [own] canonization and disturbing inquisition against his blasphemous critics.


Interestingly, Kennedy also attacks Trump. Trump represented an existential crisis. Fauci is contrasted to Trump's desultory, narcissistic bombast. erratic President.


Kennedy says, "Dr. Anthony Fauci spent half a century as America's reigning health commissar, ever preparing for his final role as Commander of history's biggest war against a global pandemic. Beginning in 1968, he occupied various posts at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), serving as the agency's Director since November 1984."


Okay, half-a-century as health commissar? (He repeats "50-year regime" in the Introduction.) Kennedy can't count and his fact checkers can't check. Fauci's early work in the work in the government before he took over NIAID in 1984, a post that hardly serves as commissar, did not have that much influence. Almost forty years might be honest if Kennedy wants to smear him with that title. Capitalizing "Commander" is a cheap smear. COVID, the world's biggest pandemic? I would have said the forty some years of AIDS with 40 million dead outranks the several years of COVID with seven million dead. (Of course, Fauci did have a large role in AIDS.)


Kennedy cites Fauci as saying "attacks on me quite frankly are attacks on science." Rather than those nine words, Kennedy should have at least provided his full sentence. "A lot of what you're seeing as attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science, because all of the things that I have spoken about, consistently from the very beginning, have been fundamentally based on science."


"Attacks on me" without "a lot of" makes it sound like Fauci is claiming infallibility. And Fauci does go on to explain his assertion. He further stated in that interview, ". . .if you go through each and every one of them, you can explain and debunk it immediately. I mean, every single one."


I don't know if what Fauci says is true. It has been fairly easy to debunk most of the details Kennedy has provided so far. I do know that it is dishonest of Kennedy to take Fauci's comments out of context. (I started this critique being skeptical about Kennedy. I am beginning to get disgusted by his poor writing and how he chooses snark over context.)


Kennedy goes on to say "[Dr. Fauci acknowledged] that he twice lied to Americans to promote his agendas." Kennedy leaves it at that. There is not enough information to determine what Kennedy is referring to. I will be interested to see Kennedy give the details on that assertion. He has yet to win my confidence. 


Kennedy says, "Dr. Fauci's acolyte [meaning devoted follower]—CNN's television doctor Peter Hotez—published an article in a scientific journal calling for legislation to "expand federal hate crime protections" to make criticism of Dr. Fauci a felony." Kennedy goes on to call Hotez a "high visibility henchman." 


From Kennedy's writing so far, let me make a prediction: the above is a wildly dishonest statement. It doesn't pass the sniff test. The actual paper "Mounting antiscience aggression in the United States" does not nearly come close to suggesting criminalization of criticism of Fauci. Fauci is not even the focus of the article. Out of 13 paragraphs in the article, Fauci is mentioned only in the context of a "Fire Fauci Act" introduced in Congress by Marjorie Taylor Greene and Representative Jim Jordan claiming Fauci is hiding something. 


The article does address "expanded protection for scientists currently targeted by far-right extremism in the United States." To address this targeting, "Still another possibility is to extend federal hate-crime protections." Hate crime protections do not extend to criticism. Nowhere does it suggest that people not be allowed to criticize Fauci. 


"Dr. Hotez, who says that vaccine skeptics should be snuffed out." Ooh. How ominous, how violent. No, Hotez said that "An American anti vaccine movement is building and we need to take steps now to snuff it out." From: Will an American-Led Anti-Vaccine Movement Subvert Global Health? 


Kennedy goes back to giving Fauci superhuman status. "Dr. Fauci's direct and indirect control—through NIH, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Wellcome Trust of some 57 percent of global biomedical research funding. . ." What is this precisely saying? "Global research funding" is a term given for US funding of projects outside of the US. Is that what he means? Or the total funding of biomedical research around the globe? Which sounds like what he is suggesting.


Fauci was in charge of NIAID, not NIH. NIAID has 15% of the budget of NIH. And then there are other US agencies involved in research which total in budget, around 80 billion (NIAID is 8% of that total.) Research America states that industry (Big Pharma for example) in the United States spent $161.8 billion in research in 2020 far more than the government or private foundations. 


Fauci was the head of NIAID. That doesn't mean he single-handedly controlled its research. I have served on panels to decide which projects are funded. I never once heard a word from the top bosses which projects should be chosen or rejected. Serving on the board of Wellcome Trust or the Gates Foundation doesn't make Fauci the big decider, or as Kennedy puts it, that he had "direct or indirect control."


Fauci did have a lot of influence beyond his government position, but more like a pebble tossed into a rock pile: not nearly "control." If Fauci did have control of the COVID epidemic response, it would have gone differently. He would have put a muzzle on Trump and perhaps vaccinated Trump for rabies. I would argue that Kennedy and his skeptics had more influence in driving the COVID response disaster. People listened to him. 


Fauci and Deaths Due to COVID


Kennedy transitions to discuss "Fauci's" record in regards to COVID. "As the world watched, Tony Fauci dictated a series of policies that resulted in by far the most deaths, and one of the highest percentage COVID-19 body counts of any nation on the planet." He goes on to cite deaths by percentage of population. 


Kennedy presents the figures of death rates from COVID per million population as of September 30, 2021, presumably the cutoff time at which he turned in the book. 


He begins with the United States: 2107 deaths per million. The subsequent countries are Iran 1449 deaths per million, Sweden 1444, going on, selecting 16 more countries, citing Japan with 139 per million and ending with Tanzania 0.86 deaths per million. 


I followed these numbers closely as they came out. Kennedy's list represents an odd assortment of countries, avoiding those with the worst numbers. I'll get to those numbers in a moment. 


First, what is remarkable is how Kennedy's table totally undercuts his arguments. Throughout his introduction Kennedy has been decrying how Fauci had a huge influence over the world. Japan, among others, essentially, followed his advice. They had fewer than 7% the US death (as of September 30, 2021). Japan did quarantines. Japan did masking. Better than the United States did. 83% of people in Japan were fully vaccinated (as of November 2022, I couldn't find September 2021 figures) versus 64% in the United States. Some people in the United States listened to anti-vacciners.


Furthermore, what is left off the table are countries that did poorer than the United States and pursued policies counter to Fauci's advice. As of September 30th, 2021, Peru had 5880 deaths per million. Those countries that didn't follow his advice? Brazil, through its leader, Jair Bolsonaro, famously rejected Fauci's advice. They had 2708 deaths per million. Hungary through its strongman, Viktor Orbán, had 3095 deaths per million. (Use the above link, go to the country, the cumulative death charts and select date.)


The Kennedys have great hair. My counter argument will probably make RFK Jr.'s stand on end. The failure of the American response to COVID is because we didn't listen to Fauci. He was undercut every step of the way. By Trump declaring the infection wasn't that bad. By declaring the infection would be gone by summer. By holding mass political rallies that served as superspreader events. Trump declared that the infection was all a political game and would disappear the day after elections. 


I will examine one such superspreader event and its consequences in detail, partly because I had run the numbers myself at the time. Kristi Noem, governor of South Dakota, permitted a Harley-Davidson bikers rally in August 2020 and August 2021 attended by a total of nearly a million "vehicles." (Attendance cited by vehicles, not people. Presumably at least one person per bike.) 


Back during 2020, when I had to stay at home, I took up a project of ranking states and the District of Columbia weekly by their COVID-19 statistics to see which states were doing better and which ones were doing worse, adjusted for population. The two graphs below show the increase in hospitalizations in South Dakota and, because many bikers were not local, I added North Dakota (the same were true for other bordering states. I'll go into their statistics briefly, but will mainly focus on the Dakotas). The 2020 Harley-Davidson rally took place from August 7 to 16. The delay in hospitalizations (and ultimately deaths) is because the rally merely seeded infections. The real problem came from those who became infected infecting others, and those, in turn, infecting still others. I will presented infection numbers and deaths after the hospitalizations.


South Dakota, 2020

 

North Dakota, 2020


I would argue that hospitalizations best describe the toll of COVID infections. Deaths can be related to improvements in therapy or negatively by having hospitals overwhelmed. Cases are often underestimated with those who are asymptomatic or who have minor symptoms not being tested and counted. Other states that border South Dakota:


Nebraska, 2020


Wyoming, 2020

Montana, 2020

Iowa, 2020



Minnesota, the one other state that bordered South Dakota, I don't have a snapshot of its hospitalizations in my archive. Here are two states over the same time period that did not have dramatic increases in hospitalizations. 


Georgia, 2020


California, 2020


In the week before the South Dakota rally, South Dakota ranked 15th among states (and DC) in having the lowest rate of increase in COVID-19 infections. North Dakota was in the middle of the pack. By the week ending September 5, North and South Dakota would take up the last two places, positions they kept until the week ending November 21. 



North and South Dakota, dead last, week ending October 17

State rankings, week of July 27, before the rally.


Here is the beginning of the uptick of cases in South Dakota (left) and North Dakota (right). You might almost say some happened around the middle of August.





First come infections, then hospitalizations and then deaths. The increase in deaths in the Dakotas was not immediate, but over time became overwhelming. For South Dakota, on August 17, the day after the rally ended, the death toll stood at 153 statewide. In four months that number was up to 1300 (and still on a steep slope of climbing) an increase of 750%. In North Dakota, over the same time period, the deaths increased from 126 to 1195, an increase of 848%. In contrast, nationwide, between August 17 and December 17, the deaths increased by 89%. Numbers source. 

The Sturgis bike rally superspreader event is presented only as an example. There were others. So, did this motorcycle rally and other superspreader events occur because people were listening to Fauci? 


By downplaying the infection, Trump created a resistance to public health care precautions and ultimately had a lot of people reject the vaccination, a vaccination that Trump's policies helped create. If we did listen to Fauci, the U.S. numbers would be like those of Japan and not closer to those of Brazil. 


Furthermore, Trump gave credence to worthless therapies. I see by the chapter titles that Kennedy will discuss some of these therapies. I will deal with those arguments as they come.


A last point as I come to the end of this post. In my first entry into this series of blogs, I skipped over the Acknowledgments, suggesting that it had little to do with a critique. Now, I would like to note that Kennedy thanked eight individuals as fact checkers. That is significant. They did a poor job. His editors did a poor job. I have no fact checkers and I can usually quickly find errors (or perhaps just conscious falsities) in what he presents. 


I am about halfway through the Introduction. I cannot give you a page number. The book has no page numbers. This is in spite of referring to page numbers in the index and the table of contents. It has the feel of being self-published, even though it went through Skyhorse Press.


Continued in Part Three. 


(Note: I apologize for multiple versions of this post. I posted a long version and then accidentally overwrote with a shorter draft. In this post, I have endeavored to restore what I lost.)


Martin Hill Ortiz is the author of several novels including most recently the thriller, Floor 24. 

Floor 24
Oliver-Heber Books

"From the mob underworld to the tops of new skyscrapers, Floor 24 is a heart-thumping New York 1920's historical mystery!" - Holly Newman, bestselling author of A Chance Inquiry mystery series. 

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and his Attack on Science

 

 Big Conspiracy


 You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. Author Harlan Ellison.


Continued in Part Two and Part Three, A summary of the first three posts can be found here. The first entry discussing Chapter One is here.  The second entry discussing Chapter One is here.


When I was a teenager and living with my brothers being raised by a single parent, my mother rented a house in the small town of Las Vegas, New Mexico. It had a coal heater in the basement and, next to that heater, the previous tenant left behind a huge pile of religious-themed magazines. One title promoted the doctrine of creationism, specifically that God created the earth about 6,000 years ago. Articles declared that the propagation of the theory of evolution was the biggest conspiracy of all time. Science journals refused to publish creationist articles due to prejudice and fear of the truth. The creationists declared themselves to be like Galileo, rejected by the orthodoxy of corrupt secular science. 


Those journals set the tone for me to understand all the subsequent "biggest conspiracy ever" tales of my lifetime. The faked moon landing, those surrounding the AIDS virus, those denying global warming, and those surrounding vaccines and COVID (among many others). The advocates of those theories were unjustly persecuted. They were rejected for telling the truth. They were Galileo, struggling against the corrupt orthodoxy of the world. They often chose a timeline that showed that the world had gone to hell since a key event in their conspiracy occurred. They often choose a villain that is real: corporate corruption, personal greed, to be part of the focus of their wrath.


Having researched HIV for 30 years, I have been at the target end of some of these. HIV doesn't cause AIDS. AIDS was designed to kill homosexuals. Science and corporations are suppressing natural chemicals that would cure AIDS and promoting those that sponge the most money off of the sick (an argument that I would partly agree with but not to most of its particulars, there is a multiplicity individual drugs and alternative products). 


Remarkably, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. says that he is not anti-vaccine, that he is merely pro-vaccine safety. He has yet to write a book promoting the general worthwhileness of vaccines. However, he has written the books Vaccine Villains (2017), Profiles of the Vaccine Injured (2022), Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak (2023), among others and the one I will focus on in my blog: The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (2021).




The Title and the First Material.


The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health: A Critical Analysis. The title certainly doesn't pull punches or fail to name villains. This is already a problem for me. I prefer to be convinced step-by-step before being confronted. Being told what is "real" before providing evidence of it is the equivalent of the Soviet Union official newspaper, Pravda, which translates to "The Truth." Okay, so convince me. 


The book begins, as many do, with quotes. The first quote is Nobel Prize winner and heroic discoverer of the AIDS virus, Luc Montagnier. The second is talk show host Tucker Carlson, a go-to person for such conspiracies as the stealing of the 2020 election or the global warming "hoax." Another quote comes from actor Rob Schneider, "Deuce Bigalow." I would never have guessed that the opinions of Montagnier and Deuce Bigalow would be found together. 


As for many of the others cited, Kennedy has a nasty habit of quoting the person for one thing they agree with and ignoring the fact that they would treat many of his arguments with alarm or else that they have other wild opinions that would make any view they have a suspicious or worthless. I will come to examples of these time and again. Using prominent people who agree with one thing Kennedy is saying to give him and his arguments gravity but who would strenuously disagree with mostly ever thing else is dishonest. It would be easy for Kennedy to quote me for something we agree on: for example, the sins of big Pharma. I would hate to be quoted by him or to be associated in any way with his work. He would probably say, in my case, no loss.


Dedication & Acknowledgments


The tome (and this is a tome and a doorstop) begins with "Dr. Anthony Fauci's opinions and proclamations have been omnipresent in American media, and some people might assume his ideas are universally supported by scientists or that he somehow represents science and medicine."


Hoo-boy. So many problems with that first sentence. I would hardly call Fauci's pronouncements omnipresent and no scientist's ideas and actions are universally supported by scientists. Science is an argument. When it's good, it's a fair and bracing argument. When it starts with a sentence like this, it is a crap argument. "Some people might assume" is lazy writing that can fit anywhere into any argument. And, of course, Fauci does "somehow represent science and medicine," in fact, that is Kennedy's chief complaint, that he shouldn't. Perhaps if this sentence was better written Kennedy could have landed his point.


The next sentence is also problematic. This worries me. To analyze this book, am I going to have to go sentence by sentence? "To the contrary, many leading scientists and scholars around the world oppose lockdowns and other aspects of Dr. Fauci's pandemic management." First of all, another way to slide in a specious argument, is to use the word "many." It is so vague that it can mean hundreds of the millions of scientists or millions of them. "Opposing lockdowns or other aspects"? To get past that requirement you would have to completely agree with Fauci on everything. I don't agree with Fauci on everything. Doesn't make me want to be part of Kennedy's claimed "many." 


Robert Kennedy is a good lawyer. He provides sentences composed of smoke and mirrors to wow without concern for substance. The above sentences could be used to fit just about anything that anyone could claim is a controversy. Substance is science. The writing so far is crap. 


I am critiquing this while reading a page at a time. That has some faults. Perhaps a convincing argument will be built. However, Kennedy is not writing this in such a format. He is stating his conclusions before supporting them. 


Continuing with the dedication, he talks about heroes of the truth who "may one day restore from the shattered souls" of the medical profession and the scientific establishment.


In dedication, he names 47 individuals, all but one preceded by the title "Dr." (that one is also a doctor, poor editing). Some are noted for their accomplishments, some are merely referred to as physician. 


I really don't want to go through 47 names and research each of their positions. I suspect some of them do agree with Kennedy, and are not being named because they are miscellaneous heroes. Instead, I used a random number generator to choose two to look at. The numbers that came up were 13 and 36.


Hoo-boy. The thirteenth entry was Dr. Didier Raoult, as the book put it, Director Infectious and Tropical Emergent Diseases Research Unit (France), physician and microbiologist. Technically, this was not true. He retired in 2021 after a scandal regarding his ethical practices "30 years of unregulated experiments on humans." Journals retracted six of his pre-COVID papers. A criminal investigation is underway. Perhaps Kennedy will declare him one of the persecuted. 


The thirty-sixth entry is Dr. Catherine L. Lawson, Rutgers University Research Professor, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine. Her profile in the Rutgers page says that she is retired. I reviewed her published articles and couldn't find her opinions on COVID. Her one paper that refers to COVID at all, says, "New features and resources are described in detail using examples that showcase recently released structures of SARS-CoV-2 proteins and host cell proteins relevant to understanding and addressing the COVID-19 global pandemic." I contacted her. She politely replied, saying that she was surprised to be on the list but that she did support Kennedy's efforts at vaccine safety.


To some extent there is nothing wrong with the dedication as presented as long as it is treated in the spirit of a dedication. If he dedicated it to Galileo Galilei, that would be fine. It doesn't mean that Galileo endorses the book. 


I will skip over Acknowledgments as it has nothing to do with his arguments.


I will mostly skip over the Publisher's Note. It is the opinion of the publisher. Skyhorse Publishing does take on a variety of controversial issues (and sometimes controversial people) but that is free speech. Perhaps I will revisit this subject. I believe censorship is going to be part of Kennedy's arguments.


Introduction.


Finally getting to the meat of the book, we have the introduction. It begins with a quote. 


"The first step is to give up the illusion that the primary purpose of modern medical research is to improve Americans' health most effectively and efficiently. In our opinion, the primary purpose of commerically funded clinical research is to maximize final return on investment, not health." John Abramson, MD, Harvard University.


I almost completely agree with this sentiment. It does, however, refer to commercially-funded clinical research, so it is a bit strange to use it to begin a critique of government-funded research. Okay, there is a fair amount of connection between the two, but that should be established before making such a critique, or be substituted with a quote that actually addresses government-funded research. Also, it should be noted that John Abramson is adamant about the effectiveness of COVID vaccines, as can be found in this interview where he describes COVID vaccines as being protective twenty times above not taking them. 


Such acts of drawing on the prestige of scientists while ignoring the bottom line of what they say makes me suspect every quote used by Kennedy. Which is not fair on my part. I am sure he's bound to quote some who genuinely support his views.


Okay, on to a lengthy diatribe, perhaps his core diatribe. I encounter a problem here. How to quote it without running foul of copyright laws but to give his arguments their due. 


I should at least provide the opening salvo. "I wrote this book to help Americans–and citizens across the globe–understand the historical underpinnings of the bewildering cataclysm that began in 2020." Hey, that's a good opening sentence. It doesn't rely on fuzzy words or generic arguments that could apply to anything. 


It continues with "In that single annus horribilis, liberal democracy effectively collapsed worldwide." Okay, now I'm having problems. Providing the conclusion as a fait accompli. I would feel much more receptive to his arguments if he began, in a lawyerly way, to say that "I intend to show. . ." Frankly, this is an argument that is selecting the readership. In your face! Agree with me and we go on.


And he does go on. Still, first paragraph. "The very governmental health regulators, social media eminences, and media companies that idealistic populations relied upon as champions of freedom, health, democracy, civil rights, and evidence-based public policy seemed to collectively pivot in a lockstep assault against free speech and personal freedoms." (end of first paragraph)


I do appreciate he couched this with the word "seemed." This is what seemed to Kennedy and others to be happening and it is clear he is expressing an opinion rather than claiming a fact. He repeats "seemed" in the next sentence which reiterates and expands this notion.


Skipping down a little. For the third paragraph he abandons seemed and declares "shell-shocked citizens experienced all the well-worn tactics of rising totalitarianism. . ." 


I am not going to analyze this line-by-line. It would be tedious for you and much of the first several paragraphs repeat what has been said above. It can be summed up with his declaration of the COVID response as "a bewildering array of draconian diktats . . ."


In the fifth paragraph we get to Dr. Anthony Fauci. "Standing in the center of all the mayhem, with his confident hand on them, was one dominating figure." Okay, from an American perspective, that is arguable. I would have said that Donald Trump was the one I would choose to fit that description, for America. Trump (and then Biden) had more power than Fauci, one of several major scientists at NIH and the other agencies that oversee health research. When it came to the worldwide response, I would make a spitball estimate that Fauci had a small percentage of a role. Below WHO, the EU, those leaders of the billions who live outside of the United States, etc. And for the worse, I would say the leaders of China played a more dominating role. Yes, the United States does take an oversized role in influencing the world, but not so much as to provide "one dominating figure." 


Fauci was head of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), an institute with a budget of around 6.5 billion dollars. NIAID is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). In 2021, NIH had a budget of 42.9 billion dollars. As you can see, he was in charge of a fraction of NIH and NIH is a fraction of the total U.S. health research budget along with other large agencies such as USDA and CDC. On top of this, Fauci was an advisor to the president. Fauci's influence was important, but hardly all-dominating. If Fauci were all-dominating, Trump would not have made many of his pronouncements regarding COVID.


Kennedy goes on to talk about himself, about his history as a Democrat, and his fights as an environmental lawyer against Big Oil and Big Coal. Good for him. (I'm not being sarcastic: good for him.)


Here he pivots to what I consider a disingenuous presentation. "NIH owns hundreds of vaccine patents and often profits from the sale of products it supposedly regulates." Umm, no. NIH does not profit anymore than the National Park Service profits from selling snowglobes in their tourist centers. I suppose the next sentence is there to state that individuals pockets money. "High level officials, including Dr. Fauci, receive yearly emoluments of up to $150,000 in royalty payments on products they help develop and then usher through the approval process."


Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Soviet dissident and Nobel Prize winner, once said that, with a careful reading of Soviet newspapers you could learn the hidden truth. This applies to the above sentence. First of all, it uses the classic advertising lingo of "up to." Save up to 50%, a true statement which includes "or save nothing at all" and even "pay more." (I fell for this while switching my cellular service a couple of years ago. It's going to be $35 a month, no hidden fees, right? I asked a half-dozen times.) Secondly, the sentence says "high level officials including Dr. Fauci." This tells me that Kennedy didn't have Dr. Fauci's numbers. If he did have Dr. Fauci's numbers and they were bad, he would have presented them. Or, if he was being out and out dishonest, and had Fauci's numbers and they were unimpressive, he was lumping Fauci together with others to make Fauci look like he was getting a lot of money. 


The next sentence says "The FDA receives 45 percent of its budget from the pharmaceutical industry . . ." an enlightening observation, but Fauci doesn't work for the FDA. Kennedy is making the case for Fauci as guilt due to others guilt. (Hey, we got a bad system.) There are other problems with that sentence. A good deal of the money the FDA receives comes from pharmaceutical companies who pay for the process to try to get their drugs approved. That's a good thing and a bad thing. Good: Make them pay. Bad: The money is almost like lobbying. There are dramatic instances where that monetary influence has led to bad decisions. There are also instances where conscientious workers at the FDA turned down drug approvals in spite of heavy, well-funded pressure from the pharm industry.


This blog is running very long and I'm barely half-way through the introduction. There are so many problems with the book. I will continue my analysis in future blog posts. I will leave with two matters. First, I should share this next sentence because it is sounds like a thesis statement and finally does talk about what Kennedy intends to prove rather than just hurling manure. I think it is an excellent place to let Kennedy speak for himself without comment or critique.


"In this book, I track the rise of Anthony Fauci from his start as a young public health researcher and physician through his metamorphosis into the powerful technocrat who helped orchestrate and execute 2020's historic coup d'état against Western democracy." 


I will finish this entry by addressing the following statement. "His [Fauci's] $417,608 annual salary makes him the highest paid of all four million federal employees, including the President." (The President makes $400,000.) First of all, this is not true. As to how many federal employees make more, I do not know. However, with a ten-second Google search (I type fast), I found that the head of the Tennessee Valley Authority made in the millions and several of his underlings made more than a million. 


Secondly, this statement lacks context. Physicians are typically among the highest paid public employees. The average U.S. physician specialist makes $380,000 per year (plastic surgeons average $570,000). Fauci would not be considered the average specialist–and I'm not saying that simply because of his reputation (Time Magazine Man of the Year) which would have added to his salary in the private sector. He has been a physician going on fifty years and a private career would have been paying him much more than "the average" physician, a set which includes those just out of medical school. Fauci took a pay cut to do his job.


Continued in Part Two. Part three can be found here. A summary of the first three posts can be found here. The first entry discussing Chapter One is here. 



Martin Hill Ortiz is the author of several novels including most recently the thriller, Floor 24. 

Floor 24
Oliver-Heber Books

"From the mob underworld to the tops of new skyscrapers, Floor 24 is a heart-thumping New York 1920's historical mystery!" - Holly Newman, bestselling author of A Chance Inquiry mystery series.

Thursday, October 24, 2024

My Favorite Quotes on Writing

 

Reading is like breathing in. Writing is like breathing out. Pam Allyn


When I encountered the above quote, I was immediately captivated, finding it concise and wise. I asked myself what were my favorite quotes regarding writing and, to supplement these, went through websites that collected pithy bits of wisdom. I present my selections below. 


The Obsession.


If my doctor told me I had only six minutes to live, I wouldn't brood. I'd type a little faster. Isaac Asimov


"It's Harder Not To." Carl Van Doren, when asked if it was hard to write.


What moves those of genius, what inspires their work is not new ideas, but their obsession with the idea that what has already been said is still not enough. Eugene Delacroix


On Getting On With It.


Start before you're ready.  Steven Pressfield


Writing a novel is like driving a car at night. You can only see as far as your headlights, but you can make the whole trip that way. E. L. Doctorow


We have to continually be jumping off cliffs and developing our wings on the way down. Kurt Vonnegut


There's no such thing as writer's block. That was invented by people in California who couldn't write.  Terry Pratchett


Where Writing Comes From.


You want to tell a story? Grow a heart. Grow two. Now, with the second heart, smash the first one into bits. Charles Yu.


Our stories are the tellers of us. Chris Cleave


Tears are words that need to be written. Paulo Coelho


I write to discover what I know. Flannery O'Connor


Stories aren't made of language: they're made of something else... perhaps they're made of life. Philip Pullman


We are cups, quietly and constantly being filled. The trick is knowing how to tip ourselves over and let the beautiful stuff out.  Ray Bradbury


The Multiple Lives of Writers.


We write to taste life twice, in the moment and in retrospect. Anaïs Nin


Writers live twice. Natalie Goldberg


Writers aren't people exactly. Or, if they're any good, they're a whole lot of people trying so hard to be one person.  F. Scott Fitzgerald


Writing is a socially acceptable form of schizophrenia. E.L. Doctorow


Rules. 


There are three rules for writing the novel. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are. W. Somerset Maugham


Instructions for living a life:

Pay attention.

Be astonished.

Tell about it.

Mary Oliver


Atticus told me to delete the adjectives and I'd have the facts. Harper Lee


The road to hell is indubitably paved with adverbs. paraphrasing Stephen King (I added the word indubitably.)


An exclamation point is like laughing at your own joke.  F. Scott Fitzgerald


Prose is architecture, not interior decoration. Ernest Hemingway


You don't write about the horrors of war. No. You write about a kid's burnt socks lying in the road.  Richard Price


Ideas and Inspiration. 


If you wait for inspiration to write, you're not a writer, you're a waiter.  Dan Poynter


You can't use up creativity. The more you use, the more you have. Maya Angelou


Ideas are like rabbits. You get a couple and learn how to handle them, and pretty soon you have a dozen. John Steinbeck


Imagination is everything. It is the preview of life's coming attractions.  Albert Einstein


Editing. 


The first draft is you just telling yourself the story.  Terry Pratchett


I'm writing a first draft and reminding myself that I'm simply shoveling sand into a box so that later I can build castles.  Shannon Hale


You can always edit a bad page. You can't edit a blank page.  Jodi Picoult


The secret of being a bore is to tell everything. Voltaire


So the writer who breeds more words than he needs 

is making a chore for the reader who reads.  Dr. Seuss


When you are describing a shape, or sound, or tint, 

don’t state the matter plainly, but put it in a hint. 

And learn to look at all things with a sort of mental squint.  Lewis Carroll


General Advice.


How vain it is to sit down to write when you have not stood up to live. Henry David Thoreau


A good story is a dream shared by the author and the reader. Anything that wakes the reader from the dream is a mortal sin. Victor J. Banis


You may tell a tale that takes up residence in someone's soul, becomes their blood and self and purpose. That tale will move them and drive them and who knows that they might do because of it, because of your words. That is your role, your gift.  Erin Morgenstern


As a writer, you should not judge, you should understand. Ernest Hemingway


You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant. Harlan Ellison


Easy reading is damn hard writing.  Nathaniel Hawthorne


Words are sacred. They deserve respect. If you get the right ones, in the right order, you can nudge the world a little.  Tom Stoppard


If you get to like it, grammar reveals the hidden meaning of history, hides disorder and abandonment, links things and brings opposites together. Delphine de Vigan


I think life is too serious to be taken seriously. Ray Bradbury


Don't listen to writing advice and, most especially, don't listen to me. Martin Hill Ortiz



Miscellaneous.


Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  Groucho Marx


The pen is mightier than the sword, and considerably easier to write with. Marty Feldman


I'm writing a book. I've got the page numbers done.  Steven Wright


If you have any young friends who aspire to become writers, the second-greatest favor you can do them is to present them with copies of The Elements of Style. The first-greatest, of course, is to shoot them now while they're happy.  Dorothy Parker


The following sources have further quotes on writing and, on some occasions, longer versions of the above quotes.


Sources: 

https://www.inc.com/glenn-leibowitz/50-quotes-from-famous-authors-that-will-inspire-yo.html

https://www.audible.com/blog/quotes-writing

https://www.nicolemgulotta.com/blog/25-inspirational-quotes

https://storyempire.com/2021/09/24/quotes-on-writing-from-famous-writers/

https://getfreewrite.com/blogs/writing-success/55-motivational-writing-quotes?srsltid=AfmBOopI0czyArIVM-qCp3SIMDUd6PTPQ918RdhX-HwFP3oM1uKfKdxP

https://writergadgets.com/funny-writing-quotes/

https://www.bryndonovan.com/2020/10/26/20-funny-quotes-about-writing/

https://jerichowriters.com/99-quotes-about-writing-by-the-worlds-greatest-writers/

https://ronovanwrites.com/2016/05/19/16-quotes-of-for-writers-obsession/

me.


Martin Hill Ortiz is the author of several novels including most recently the thriller, Floor 24. 

Floor 24
Oliver-Heber Books

"From the mob underworld to the tops of new skyscrapers, Floor 24 is a heart-thumping New York 1920's historical mystery!" - Holly Newman, bestselling author of A Chance Inquiry mystery series.


Saturday, September 14, 2024

Floor 24: Themes of the Novel

 



Floor 24, Martin Hill Ortiz 
Oliver-Heber Books.

"From the mob underworld to the tops of new skyscrapers, Floor 24 is a heart-thumping New York 1920's historical mystery!" - Holly Newman, bestselling author of A Chance Inquiry mystery series.



My novel, Floor 24, is the first installment in a trilogy called The Skyline Murder Mysteries. Taken together they tackle an ambitious theme: What went wrong in the 20th century. The skyscrapers rising in Manhattan symbolizes the wild growth of the 1920s: a vertigo of optimism that would soon meet the crash of the Depression. 



        The modern world began at Number 50 Broadway—a lot of blame to place on a single building. . . . the architect settled on an impossibly tall and thin design. All the buildings which had come before, like beetles, had been supported by their outer shells, becoming as big and as brawny as their stone or brick walls could be stacked. Castles and cathedrals reigned as the tallest buildings in the world. The Tower at 50 Broadway took its cue from evolution: creatures could grow taller and more immense using internal skeletons. So, the architect cried, "Let there be life!" and constructed his new beast using an inner framework of steel, thus giving birth to a modern breed of titans, giants with spires that raked the sky. (From Floor 24)



Actual buildings figure prominently in the book. Two iterations of Number 50 Broadway, the Adams Express Building, the Vanderbilt Mansion at 666 Fifth Avenue, the World Building, the Capitol Theater, the Gotham Hotel, and the Columbia Trust. Others make brief cameos. 



Number 50 Broadway, the Tower Building (center)
The first building to be fully supported by an internal steel skeleton,
providing the template for skyscrapers.
Photo taken after it had been dwarfed by its neighbors.

 

Cliffs rose around Wall Street. The masses and the masters separated. Those above owned the sun and towered over the rest of us, who were cast into a pit of shadows. With the people and the prestige separated, New York became even more concentrated as a center of power, until that power became a monster, more imperious and more controlling than the cathedrals and palaces of yesteryear. (from Floor 24)



666 5th Avenue. Vanderbilt Mansion 
It's creepy and it's spooky, it's altogether ooky.



The New Century


The 20th century began with wild optimism. New inventions including electrical lighting, motor cars, and telephony were creating a modern world. European wars seemed to belong to a distant age, as far away as the days of Napoleon. Modern thinkers explored the mysteries of the universe and the mind. Women began to have rights. With motion pictures, the people had a populist medium and stories promoted the triumph of the underdog as expressed by the works of Charlie Chaplin. Flooded by immigrants, America boomed. But all was not well. In 1914, longstanding jealousies and grievances plunged the world into its first global war. New inventions were created to enhance killing. Every new medium for communication becomes co-opted by propagandists. In 1915, the film, The Birth of a Nation, revived the Ku Klux Klan who promoted an anti-minority and anti-immigrant nativism. This revolution swept over the United States. In the 1920s, a boom of wealth for a moment masked our hatred and divisions. Women had the vote. In 1928 Catholic was nominated to be president, a Jewish man to be the governor of New York. The skyline of Manhattan grew with ever-taller buildings. But behind the official sobriety of Prohibition was rum-running, gangsterism, and corruption. The wealth of the roaring twenties proved illusory.


With the Depression, around the world despots took advantage of the economic turmoil. The new medium of communication, radio was conscripted as a propagandist tool to bring long-simmering hatreds to a boil.


The demolition of the Vanderbilt Mansion (1926)
is featured in my book. The "S's" in the stairway railing
stand for Stanford White, the architect.
Construction versus destruction is a theme of my novel.



This is the simplified story of the rise and fall of the early 20th Century, the backdrop to my novel and to the series. The world could have turned out very differently. In January 1933, Hitler managed to become Chancellor of Germany after receiving only 33% of the vote. In 1928, Franklin Roosevelt won the governorship of New York by a mere 0.6%, launching him into position to take the White House four years later. He was inaugurated as President on March 4, 1933. On March 5, Hitler held the last multi-party elections in Germany, consolidating his power.


Progress versus regression and building versus destruction have been at constant war with one another.


Martin Hill Ortiz


The Adams Express Building, center




The Columbia Trust Building.
Originally, The Knickerbocker Trust.


The Capitol Theater, Movie Palace.


Saturday, August 31, 2024

A Very Entertaining Death. My First Alan Priest Story

 

This story marked the first appearance of Alan Priest, the one-handed journalist who is the protagonist of my mystery series, The Skyline Murder Mysteries. The first in the series, Floor 24, will be available September 17.


A Very Entertaining Death, Mystery Magazine, March 2016. 


A Very Entertaining Death

Martin Hill Ortiz


While waiting for the spectacle to begin, I cut and shuffled a deck of cards with my left hand, keeping the ace on top, practicing a skill I would never again use. I stopped mid-cut: the goose-honk of a squeeze-bulb car-horn announced the arrival of the hearse. I dropped the deck into my jacket pocket.


Giggling bathing beauties stood planted on the running boards of the approaching lemon-yellow Packard. Its nose-end acted as a ship's bow, parting the crowd which swept back in rippling waves. Curtains cloaked the windows of its stretched-out cargo hold. The vehicle rolled to a stop at the brink of a neatly-carved rectangular pit.


Flappers in their tube-like dresses, the tassels on their knee-high hems shimmying, strained against the cordoned-off perimeter. Some blew kisses. Dandies, resuscitated after a night of celebrating Prohibition—genteel gentlemen for whom daylight was a curse word—balanced on their toes to witness the hullabaloo. Young nippers roosted on tombstones; some braved the roofs of mausoleums.


With dainty back-kicks, the beauties sprang from the running boards. The front and back cabin doors swung open and five beefy men climbed out. They glared at the offensive sun, tugged at their cuffs and screwed on their top hats. After delivering indifferent waves to the audience, they rounded the hearse. One opened the rear compartment, grabbed the handle at the head of the coffin within and hauled it backwards on its rollers. The others took hold of the side grips and lifted. They lugged the pine box, carrying it over to and setting it down beside the gaping grave. The casket lid flipped and presto! Richard French, The Famous Frenchini, popped up to the cheers of the crowd.


"Hello, my fine admirers!" the magician called out, his arms spread wide as though he could embrace the entire breadth of the mob. "Prepare yourselves to bear witness the single greatest feat in the history of mankind: An escapade not to be beheld by those of feeble in breast or weak in constitution. I, the Famous Frenchini, will slip free from the bony fingers of the merciless reaper and escape the bonds of death!"


I had to hand it to Richard: he knew how to throw a funeral. Lurking in the shadows cast by the spotlight of Houdini's fame was a pack of aspiring escape artists who hungered to be the latest -ini. French had risen above the ambitious rabble. With the bonny good looks of a photoplay star and the bombast of P.T. Barnum, his celebrity had swelled well beyond his mediocre skills as an illusionist.


Not fair. Showmanship is a crucial part of the magic trade, and Frenchini was a master of pure audacious theater. I was a master of jealousy.


"Alan!" Someone recognized me and slipped through the crowd, heading my way. It was Mark Buchanan, the Amazing Something or Other. He had an act so forgettable even those who knew him couldn't remember his stage name. Nice guy, though. He reached out to shake my right hand and, in a moment of shock I'd seen hundreds of times before, noticed it was not there. I shoved the stub of my wrist into his hand.


"What . . .?" he couldn't even finish his question.


"I lost it during the Great War," I told him. "I checked the Army's Lost and Found. Lots of body parts, none of them mine."


He didn't know what to make of my sense of humor or whether it was humor, and not just angry spitting in the sand.


"I thought you were here with the magician's crowd," he said.


"Forced retirement. I'm covering this event for the Evening World." I tapped a knuckle on the top page of note papers taped around the forearm of my right sleeve. "I usually handle the city hall beat, but Cobb, my boss, knows about my pre-war stage act, so he sent me here. He wants a front page scoop on how it's done."


Under normal circumstances, I'd never rat out an illusionist, but Frenchini dared his fellow artists to do just that, offering a five hundred dollar reward to the first person who could show how he performed his miracle—how he had escaped being buried alive. He vowed the coffin and all items devised to secure him would be made available afterwards for inspection. In my estimation, that seemed like too reckless a promise: the Famous, not-even-great, Frenchini was begging to be exposed.


A pair of policemen in brass-buttoned coats affixed handcuffs to French's wrists. "Tighter!" Frenchini shouted and, as the manacles pinched his flesh, the magician grimaced and demanded again, "Tighter!"


With his wrists suitably crushed, Frenchini lofted his hands over his heads, saying, "To prove I have no key in my possession I ask that my clothes and my body should now be thoroughly searched." One of the bluecoats patted him down and poked a finger in his mouth. The search was laughably brief.


"He possesses not a key," the policeman announced in a brogue so thick he had to be a vaudevillian shill. "I swear by me dear Mother Molly's soul!" So phony. The crowd loved it.


The first principle of any magic trick is misdirection. While the crowd watched the pallbearers wrap The Famous Frenchini in a chain so bulky each link was as big as a fist, I watched the real show. The other magicians and escape artists, a sullen group, milled about in a roped off corner, covetous of the five-hundred-dollar reward.


They all hated French. Prominent was Jim Crandall, who had publicly accused Frenchini of stealing his illusions. Standing in back and a head taller than the rest was Devlin Rastofsky, the Red Devil, whom Frenchini had humiliated on stage. Along for the show was Jon Ketcham, The Toymaker. A genius at fashioning elaborate contraptions, he could transform a second-rate illusionist into a first-class star. He held a grudge against most every magician, penny-pinchers all of them, who gave him neither proper payment nor recognition. Now, in his eighties, the left side of his face drooped from a recent stroke. Hell, even Benny, the Evening World's photo boy was bitter from the time Frenchini had smashed his camera gear after taking an unflattering picture.


With the chain cocooning Frenchini's arms and torso, a padlock the size of a wall clock was snapped in place in front, connecting the two end links. Its keyhole was roomy enough to stick a thumb inside.


Frenchini took this opportunity to make a speech. "I do hereby pledge this oath before all of you and before the ever-listening ears of the Almighty. In one hour, when you seek me in this pine vessel, you shall find neither my body nor my bones. I will have crossed over. Shakespeare, the majestic versifier, declared death to be 'the undiscovered country.' I am its explorer! The Egyptian pharaoh, Cheops, nay, even Ramses himself, whose very daughter plucked the castaway Moses from the hinterland of bulrushes, spoke of the City of the Dead. The secret entrance to this necropolis has been passed on to me by the venerable calif of Khartoum. In my hours free of this world's shackles, I shall promenade that purgatorial city's boulevards, brushing shoulders with Lincoln and Socrates, history's greats and its lesser-knowns. The fortunate among you will witness my resurrection at the Hardy Theater on 44th and 9th at the hour of eight this evening. That is, those of you who have purchased tickets."


The five pallbearers hefted the immobile magician and his chains into the wooden box. At this moment, I fully expected the pallbearers to shut the casket before lowering him into the grave. The magician's number one rule about being buried alive: don't do it. Instead, make sure you have an escape hatch and get out of the coffin before you go below. Houdini escaped from a six-foot deep sandy grave in 1915 and it almost killed him, the weight of the sand crushing his chest. This soil was moist, loamy and heavier and Frenchini possessed maybe half of Houdini's strength. Possessing more bravura than brains, French ignored common sense. Ropes were looped through the coffin's handles and the still-open casket was lowered into the earth.


Lying there in the death box, wrapped in chains, Frenchini called for the photographers. "Time to fill your front pages, boys." With the depth of the grave and its block of shadows, it was hard for the cameramen to angle their cameras and flash plates. Flames blazed, shutters snapped and the soot of flash powder drifted down.


The ropes were detached. A pallbearer lowered the end of a pole into the grave, hooked a latch on the lid and swung it shut. The Toymaker, leaning heavily on a cane carved with the figures of gargoyles, flipped over a big-bellied hourglass. The five pallbearers made quick work of shoveling dirt. Even the bathing beauties helped toss in handfuls. A four-piece band began playing Sousa, heavy on the tuba and kettledrum, light on the rhythm and melody. The crowd didn't know what to do. The shuffling of feet became milling about, muttering became groaning. Resurrection makes for good entertainment but it needs a warm-up act.


I tore the top sheet off of the notepad taped to my sleeve, creased the page and sunk it in my jacket pocket then used my Ever-Sharp pencil to continue to jot down some more colorful phraseologies for the evening edition.


After twenty-some minutes, when my thoughts ran dry, I wandered over to the magician's clique to collect some quotes. "Have you figured out the trick?" I asked Rastofsky.


The Red Devil tweaked the point on his beard. "He hasn't escaped yet, has he? I suspect after an hour we'll dig him up and he'll jump out of the coffin and claim the joke is on us."


Jim Crandall said, "He went down with the coffin. If he does disappear, you can lay odds you'll find this grave is set over a sewer pipe. A trap door out and a slimy crawl through the muck. That would be his class."


Huh. I had suspected comments along the lines of, "I'm saving my solution for the prize money." Instead, both seemed disturbed for the same reason I was: Frenchini really did bury himself alive.


I took the illusion apart, piece by piece. Handcuffs? Easy. The frisking was amateur at best. His policeman confederate could easily have slipped the key into Frenchini's palm. Even with the stricture of the chains, he could pop the manacles open before the thump of the closing coffin lid had time to fade.


The chains? They looked heavy and gave a hefty clunk as they were wrapped around him. I supposed some links could be painted balsa wood. No—he had promised we could inspect the materials afterwards. While the handcuffs were tight, the chains were just thick and heavy. He would need to pop the big padlock on top of the chains to get some wiggle room. A second key. Then he could squirm his way free of the chains. A painstaking task, a true athletic feat considering the size of his enclosure.


And then what? Opening the lid with a half a ton of dirt on top? Impossible. No, no, no. He had promised to disappear and reemerge on stage, not claw his way up through the soil. Maybe Crandall was right: a trap door down to a sewer. But wouldn't that show up on inspection? 


"Oh, crap," I muttered. I recognized the central lie in the illusion. The reward. No matter how well-conceived, a magic act could be figured out. Five hundred dollars? Three months wages? Frenchini must have arranged in advance to have a confederate who would declare how the trick was done. He'd probably pay the guy ten bucks. My hopes at striking pay dirt were dead and buried.


I noticed the Toymaker eyeing the hourglass, glancing at his watch and wrinkling one side of his nose. He cast a droopy eye my way. I smelled a story.


"Al-an," the Toymaker said. His voice was thick, Hungarian. His name Ketcham came as a gift from the folks on Ellis Island. "You are not the same as these riffraff. You are a straight shooter. Can I hold you to a truth?"


"I'm a news hack now. I can't afford truth." He looked at me with his sagging miserable face, the corner of his lip trembling. "But, okay, I'll hold on to your secret, just you and me. Off the record."


"It is past thirty minutes. Now, thirty-seven. Mr. French said he would signal me in one-half an hour if all went as planned.


"What kind of signal?"


"He said he would be free and in fresh clothes and disguise, standing in the Henderson crypt. He is not. If his escape is blocked, then his life is in peril and he needs our rescue. But . . . if he is merely delayed, he will damn me for my efforts which revealed his trick."


"How long can he hold out with the air down there?"


"In the practice session, forty minutes and then he blacked out."


The Toymaker looked to me to make the life-or-death decision. I knew what my paper wanted: Wait out the hour. Hope for a last-minute rescue, settle for a dramatic death.


I knew what I had to do. I snuck up behind the vaudeville policeman and picked his pocket. Then I held the phony police badge over my head and called out: "We have an emergency here. I need the pallbearers to grab their shovels and dig up the grave as fast as they can!"


The crowd rustled to life, surging forward, roaring and yelping. The hemp and post barrier that cordoned them off toppled as they pressed on to the edge of the gravesite. One of the bathing beauties fainted.


As the pallbearers dug furiously they hurled flung fresh dirt into the crowd of onlookers. One swung his shovel to scare back the mob which threatened to spill into the ever-deepening pit. When the tip of a spade thumped against the wooden box, all but one of the gravediggers climbed out. The last stood at the margin of the casket and raised its lid.


Richard French lay there, the handcuffs to one side, the padlock open, the heavy chains spread out as though he had squirmed halfway free. In his chest was a hole, a gunshot wound. Benny, God bless him, snapped a photo.


Now the crowd surged the other way as if the gunman were still present and ready to strike. "Is there a doctor?" I yelled but with the noise and confusion I doubt I was heard beyond the inner ring of the crowd. I had rudimentary medical training from my days in the army, most of it involving what to do when your comrade met with a bullet. I jumped down into the pit, landing beside the body.


French lay in a puddle of his blood. His chest was not moving. I couldn't find a pulse. The Red Devil bounded into the grave next to me. He concentrated on freeing French, tossing the handcuffs and padlock out of the grave, loosening the chains and hauling him out. With the help of the pallbearer, he heaved the body up and laid it out on a patch of grass.


"I'm a doctor." The man appeared too young for that to be true, but, as he bent over the body, he seemed to know what he was doing. He felt for a pulse, parted an eyelid, and banged tendons, checking for any reflex or response. He lit a match, pinched French's nose, and held the flame over his mouth to check for a whisper of breath.


I mulled over the chest wound. I'd seen enough of them. This was a gaping maw speckled with the shrapnel of a bullet shell, the blast of a dumdum. But how? When?


French was alive and unharmed when the coffin lid fell. He had bled to death by the time the coffin was opened. If he had managed to direct a gun at himself, where was the gun? I inspected the inside of the coffin lid: no hidden panels, no space to hide a pistol that would shoot him when it closed. I searched for any kind of hiding place. None.


The baby-faced doctor pronounced him dead. I didn't know medicine, but I'd seen enough death to concur with his diagnosis. The doctor was not playing the shill. This was not part of the magic act.


Crandall appeared beside me. His smile was rapturous. "Finally, the Famous Frenchini has performed a worthwhile illusion!" He leaned in and whispered. "He went into the coffin with an explosive bullet already implanted in his chest. That had to be the case."


Suicide? An elaborately staged death? Not Frenchini. The man was a narcissist of the first order, not someone wishing to die. He didn't just want acclaim, he had to be around to hear the applause.


That's when I made the connection: noise. Noise was the weak link. How was it possible to not hear the gunshot? There wasn't space beneath the coffin lid to point a gun barrel, much less one with a Maxim Silencer. I recalled a wire story of a lady in South Carolina where the packed dirt on top of her grave wasn't enough to muffle the sound of the still-alive occupant beating on her coffin. Which led me to the question. . . What kind of four-piece band has a tuba and a kettle-drum? 


The tuba player leaned against his instrument smoking a hand-rolled cigarette. I introduced myself as a scribe for the Evening World.


"Do you know Heywood Broun?" he asked. "I really like his column."


"Yeah, great guy. I thought I'd ask you for your thoughts on all this."


"Me? Don't got none. Long as I get paid."


"Who's paying you?"


He told me and then the tumblers clicked into place. I walked over to the killer and invited him to meet me at Lindy's, up Broadway: great cheesecake and they make you check your gun at the door.


***


While the waiters were rude, the owner's wife served as a charming hostess and the cheesecake made life worth living. I was not alone in these opinions, Jon Ketcham agreed with me on each point.


"I was born in Budapest in 1838," he told me. "I sometimes visited Houdini's family, the Weiszes. I knew the great illusionist when I was in my thirties and he was too young to escape a diaper."


"You're friends with Houdini?"


"No. He was too much the idol when I met him again."


I set down my mechanical pencil. "I figured you for the killer when I thought about that wretched Souza band. With the pains he took to present such a well-choreographed spectacle, no way French would have hired them. Along with five feet of dirt to act as muffling, the bang of a kettledrum and a tuba were just the right sounds to drown out the explosion of a gunshot."


He cast down his gaze but remained mute, so I went on. "It took a master engineer to come up with a device that would shoot French while in his coffin. I've sorted through several reasons why you chose to kill him. He was a detestable man. You made his illusions work, but he stole the glory."


"Did you consider money? I am old. I have no family on this continent. My apoplexy has made my art a near-impossible effort. Because I was too slow with my handiwork, Richard seized my schematics for his coffin escape and presented them to another craftsman to build them. I threatened to expose his trick. In response, he devised a swindle: the five hundred dollar reward. Since he knew I would reveal his secret, he sold the method to the Herald, which they promised to run only after the feat was completed. Their paper paid him for it and yet he was ready to announce they had won the reward. I have been cheated once too many times and I vowed this would be the last. I could have sold that illusion to others." He took a long, wheezing inhalation through his flaring nostrils. "One of my lungs has shut down. I cannot breathe and I cannot walk without a cane. In my situation, five hundred dollars would have seen me through to the end of my life."


The Herald paid for the scoop on the coffin escape—only the joke was on them. The illusion never took place. That was no longer the story. I was sitting across from the story. I said, "The World pays for confessions all the time. Yours will be a sensation, two-inch tall letters in front page headlines. I'll guarantee you they'll pay you in the hundreds."


"Such money will serve me no use on the electric chair."


"We'll pony up for a lawyer who'll have you out on bail and who will delay the trial for long enough to let you die at home."


"You will do that and pay me five hundred dollars."


It would be a hard sell to the Pulitzer boys but this story would double circulation. For a day. "Agreed."


The Toymaker inhaled as though it were the first time he had breathed fresh air in years. "When the casket lid shut on Mr. French he had four tasks: open the handcuffs, open the padlock, slip free of the chain and kick open the panel at the foot of the coffin. That panel was sealed with only the most gossamer of nails and beyond a veneer of dirt was a slender earthen tunnel. After passing out of the coffin, he would reattach the panel with sturdier nails, slide further down the tunnel and cause the ceiling of dirt behind him to collapse. The end of the tunnel connected to a nearby family crypt."


The collapsed tunnel, the thicker nails: he had rigged not only an ingenious escape, but the perfect cover-up.


We both sat in silence as he finished his cheesecake. He clinked the fork against the plate, signaling "more." I passed my half-finished slice over to him. Food seemed unimportant to me right now and, besides, I was scribbling as fast as I could so as to not miss a word. "But how did you manage to shoot him inside the coffin?" I asked.


"The padlock was rigged so the same small key which opened the handcuffs also opened it. However, I had time to plan. I substituted a similar-looking lock in its place. Hmmph. I overheard that fool, Crandall. He was half-right. The bullet was never shot. When the Famous Frenchini turned his key in the padlock, it was a trigger. A slot opened in the base of the lock and a spring-action bullet was propelled into Richard's chest. The bullet point was sharpened so it entered like the tip of a syringe. The impact initiated a chemical reaction and soon the bullet exploded, ensuring its deadly mission and disguising its odd shape. To all appearances, he had been shot with a hollow-point bullet." He smiled as much as his half-dead face would allow.


Sometimes I get a ghost pain, a message from the hand I no longer possess. It spoke to me now, reminding me of the blast that had taken it away. My left hand, my only physical hand, froze up in a spasm. I had had enough of this confession. I'd keep my promise and make sure The World paid Ketcham. Working together, they would manipulate the legal system and keep him alive and free until he died a cozy death at home. And yet I couldn't help but feel The World and the Toymaker were part of some deadly machine. The same machine which dug trenches and lobbed grenades.


I'd once seen a man lose his hand in the wheels of a printing press.


I looked around the restaurant. There was Damon Runyon, writer for The American, sitting across the table from his gangster buddy, Otto Berman. Charles Luciano wielded his utensils like they were weapons. Jolson and his pals were celebrating his latest Broadway sensation, Bombo. Scattered about were newshounds from the Tribune and the Daily Express, from the Times and the Daily News.


Maybe the waiters should roll out a cart. For tonight's special: the fresh meat of Richard French. All of the hungry would dig in.


Floor 24. Available September 17.